Release Notes 11.005.0

These release notes provide brief descriptions of changes included in eHarvest 11.005.0.

System Updates

Estimator

DESCRIPTION ID #

Policy Estimates: A new checkbox, Current Coverage Highlighted, has been added to the Print Forms popup when a Policy Estimate Scenarios form is printed from a Policy Estimate. When this checkbox is selected, the existing coverage will be highlighted on both the Totals and Units. The highlight will only appear when a given scenario has the same Plan, Coverage Level, and Unit Structure as the policy's coverage. This checkbox is selected by default, and it is not available for Prospect/No Grower Policy Estimates.

124727

Rate Sheets: This ticket updated the Rate Sheet with several changes to Enterprise Units that have been introduced by RMA. The Rate Sheet previously accounted for Enterprise Units (EU) and Enterprise Units by Practice (EP). RMA has since provided additional types of Enterprise Units: by Irrigation Practice (EI replaces EP), Cropping Practice (EC), and Type (ET). These are now considered Options. The Rate Sheet will continue to display these under the Unit dropdown, but several changes were made to accommodate this.

128363

Quick Estimates: An issue was found where Quick Estimates were not pulling in the MP type / practice combination for 2022. This issue has been resolved.

130390

Policy Estimates: An issue was found where Policy Estimates were not pulling in MP Coverage Levels for 2022. This issue has been resolved.

130592

Forms & Reports

DESCRIPTION ID #

Perennial Combo Form: RMA has added an Organic Producer Certification Statement to Acreage Reporting forms in the 2022 Document and Supplemental Standards Handbook (DSSH). This statement has been added to the Perennial Combo Form. This update is for all Crop Years.

122266

SPOIs: Tangerine Trees TDO SPOIs for TX were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128526

SPOIs: Orange Trees TDO SPOIs for TX were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128530

SPOIs: Grapefruit Trees TDO SPOIs for TX were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128533

SPOIs: Lemon Trees TDO SPOIs for TX were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128536

SPOIs: Lime Trees TDO SPOIs for TX were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128539

SPOIs: Mint APH SPOIs were updated and made available from RMA on June 16. The Special Provisions for 2022 have been implemented in the System.

128622

Livestock: RMA has added Effective Date for Livestock Gross Margin (LGM) for the 2022 RY to help support the change to weekly sales. This ticket added an Effective Date to the Livestock Gross Margin (LGM) Dairy Cattle Schedule of Insurance (SOI). On the Livestock policy Print tab functionality was added for users to select which Effective Date to print on the LGM Dairy Cattle SOI. If no Effective Date is selected for the SOI, a popup will display to let the user know they must select a Effective Date. Other base form standard updates were made to the LGM Dairy Cattle SOI.

129432

APH Database Form: With this ticket, the APH Database Form has been updated. The updates include changing the format to a 2-units-per-page format and adding a Record Type column along with other base form standards updates.

127595

APH Database/AR: With this ticket, the APH Database / Acreage Reporting (AR) Form has been updated. The updates include changing the format to a 2-units-per-page format and adding a Record Type column along with other base form standards updates.

Additionally, RMA added an Organic Producer Certification Statement to Acreage Reporting forms in the 2022 Document and Supplemental Standards Handbook (DSSH). This statement has been added to the form.

109709

SOI: An issue was found where a Telerik error was displaying on the Schedule of Insurance (SOI) and SOI / Production Report (when printing the Official SOI) when printing the forms in Batch Printing. For all Crop Years, the SOI and SOI Production Report have been updated so a Telerik error does not display when printing the forms in Batch Printing with the "Official SOI" print option selected.

130355

API / PRF Combo Form: A request was received to update the math on the Application pages of the API and PRF Combo Form. When TFS #94566 in the 9.030 Release (Aug 2020) moved the County Base Value field to the Acreage Reporting page(s), it caused the math on page 1 to no longer work. This issue has been resolved.

130395

Batch Scanning: A bug was reported to MCT recently, which appears to have been in the System for about a year, that impacted a specific group of agents who use the Batch Scanning features. Certain scanner settings have a feature for auto rotation that is not correctly being handled by the Batch Scanning process. This involves scanner models that allow a user to load paper in a portrait format and have the scanner automatically rotate the document to display it as a landscaped document after scanning. The rotation attribute is not visible with a regular Acrobat PDF viewer (advanced tools are needed to see the attribute within the scanner settings). The Batch Scanning bug caused the sides of the landscaped document to be cut off (left and right) because the image was assembled in a portrait format through the Batch Scanning process. This issue has been resolved.

130817

Global

DESCRIPTION ID #

The Online Help Site was updated with topics as well as with current release notes.

130384

Livestock

DESCRIPTION ID #

A request was received to add a Select All checkbox above the Processing Status column on the Coverages tab of Livestock policies similar to the one available on the MPCI tab. When selected/deselected, all coverages below with checkboxes would be selected/deselected rather than the user having to go coverage by coverage to select. With this ticket, the Processing Status header in the grid on the Coverages tab for Livestock policies has been updated to include a checkbox that, when clicked, sets all checkboxes in the column according to the checked status of that new checkbox.

The Select All checkbox has been added for all 3 Livestock plan types in the Processing Status column header, and each coverage status in the grid now has its own individual checkbox. However, this functionality is slightly different than MPCI in the fact that the checkbox only displays on LGM and LRP if the coverage is not already set to an "Approved" status. If the Processing Status is already at "Approved", there will be no checkboxes available next to each individual coverage status. For DRP policies, the checkbox is available to be selected even if a coverage is already at "Approved" as it is for MPCI.

128998

With this ticket, a new validation has been added upon save of all Livestock premium lines (for all 3 plans) for the 2022+ RYs. The validation logic from TFS #124411 (used to update the ITS suspension logic for MPCI) will be used for this ticket; however, instead of the validation applying at Mark Complete as it does for MPCI coverages, the validation logic for Livestock will be added to the Save logic for Livestock premium lines.

If the validation message is triggered, the following Warning Message will display in a popup for the user: "Ineligible {0} record(s) exist for this policy." The {0} in the message will be replaced with "Grower", "Grower, TOR and SBI", "Grower and TOR", "Grower and SBI", "TOR and SBI", "TOR", or "SBI" based on the record types found to be ineligible.

116926

Mapping

DESCRIPTION ID #

PRF Wizard: Users requested the ability to resize the PRF Wizard window; this has been implemented. A user can drag the bottom right corner to make the wizard larger or smaller.

123826

PRF Wizard: Users requested the ability to sort the Farm, Tract, and Field columns in the PRF Wizard; this has been implemented. Now, clicking on a column label reveals a sorting arrow. Click the label again to reverse the sort direction.

123829

Two bugs were fixed with this ticket:

1. The Sync from Mapping for PRF was not syncing from AR correctly--values were not being overwritten when back-end system is updated. This has been corrected.

2. Since insurable acres are insurable by GRID ID, meaning they should be summed for each unit group in the same coverage by grid ID. This was not being done but has been corrected.

130404

RMA released a new CLU Layer for September 2021; this has been implemented in the System.

130563

Users reported that the practice code was not included in the PRF Agency Extract when the practice was non-irrigated; this has been corrected.

130655

MPCI

DESCRIPTION ID #

Trend Adjustment: Per the 2022 Trend Adjustment (TA) Handbook, the "PR" and "VF" yield types are now considered actual yield types and are eligible for trend adjustment beginning in 2022+ RYs. The System has been updated to now consider "PR" and "VF" yields descriptors, within a qualifying APH database, as actual yield types when determining if a database qualifies for Trend Adjustment.

128339

PAW: Per the Crop Insurance Handbook for the 2022+ RYs, the PAW question wording for the question, "Has damage (e.g., disease, hail, freeze) occurred to Trees/Vines/Bushes/Bog that will reduce the insured crop's production from previous crop years?", needs to now include the word "insurable" within the question wording. The System has been updated to include "insurable" between "to" and "Trees/Vines/Bushes/Bog" in this PAW question.

128658

APH: Per the 2022 CIH Handbook, the "VF" actual yield descriptor is now eligible for Yield Exclusion (YE) if the APH contains an eligible crop year for exclusion as identified in the actuarial documents beginning in 2022+ RYs. The System has been updated to now consider the "VF" yield descriptor within an APH where an eligible crop year is applicable for Yield Exclusion (YE).

128659

PTY & APH: A display bug was identified during internal testing of the PTY recalc functionality. When changes are made to an underlying unit, the System displays a "PTY - Needs Recalc" message on both the PTY Summary Unit and the underlying unit where a change was made. This message was found to always display when the underlying APH was Native Sod or New Breaking. The "PTY - Needs Recalc" message has been updated to no longer display on Native Sod and New Breaking APHs.

129443

Native Sod: When Native Sod procedures apply to acreage, the APH is limited to 65% of the T-Yield. In the initial year, the APH is completed using 65% of the T-Yield, in subsequent years any actual history plus applicable variable T-Yields are used to complete the APH, but the approved and rate yields are still limited to 65% of the T-Yield. An AIP raised a question about use of the PTY in these procedures. In the initial year of Native Sod, the CIH confirms that the PTY is not used unless Native Sod acreage makes up 5% or less of total acres in the unit. In this scenario, 65% of the PTY can be used. Furthermore, in subsequent years, the CIH confirms the APH is limited to 65% of the PTY.

Additional research confirmed two gaps in the System's current Native Sod APH logic:

In the initial year of Native Sod, if Native Sod acreage makes up 5% or less of total acres in the unit, the APH can use 65% of the PTY instead of 65% of the T-Yield. Currently the system uses 65% of the T-Yield.
In subsequent years, if PTY applies, Native Sod APHs can use 65% of the PTY instead of 65% of the T-Yield. Currently, the System uses 65% of the T-Yield.

To account for these gaps in the current logic, this ticket implements the following changes:

1. When it is the initial year of planting and Native Sod acreage makes up 5% or less of total acreage in the unit, the System will use 65% of the PTY to complete an APH and set the approved/rate yields to 65% of the PTY. The System will identify this scenario by the following criteria:
PTY Summary Unit exists on the coverage for the type/practice/t-yield map area
Native Sod checkbox is selected on the Written Agreement
Initial Year of Planting checkbox is selected on the Written Agreement
Acreage Type on the Detail Line is "E" (Insured new breaking under terms of the policy), < 5%, & acreage never in production
2. When it is the subsequent year of Native Sod and PTY applies, the System will use the PTY to determine the applicable variable T-Yield to complete the APH combined with any actual history. Approved/Rate yields will be set to 65% of the PTY. The system will identify this scenario by the following criteria:
PTY summary unit exists on the coverage for the type/practice/t-yield map area
Native Sod checkbox is selected on the Written Agreement
Initial Year of Planting checkbox is not selected on the Written Agreement

129444

Perennials: A bug was reported following the 11.000 release that impacted agency users as they updated Perennial PAW data. The error was thrown at save of the PAW page and was preventing updates for the 2022 RY from being saved to the database. The error was re-created on fruit and tree policies. The issue has been resolved.

NOTE: This bug did not impact AIP users updating the same data fields.

130870

Perennials: An issue was reported for CA Citrus Tree functionality on the Add MPCI Quote page where a user was not able to select the required Type within the select list. The System has been updated to now allow the user to select a Type from the select list on the Add MPCI Quote page.

130918

Transmissions: According to the P14 exhibit, when a Unit Structure Transaction Code applies to a base policy, that same value must also be sent on the P14 record for the related SCO/ECO/HIP/MP/STAX policy. This ticket addressed the SCO P14 Record Only. RMA has clarified that the Unit Structure Transaction Code must be the same between the base policy and any related SCO/ECO/HIP/MP/STAX P14 records. However, the enterprise unit option codes (EI, EC, ET, MC) will not be required or even allowed on the SCO/ECO/HIP/MP/STAX. For this ticket, the P14 transmission logic was updated for SCO to send the same Unit Structure Transaction Code on both the base and SCO P14 records.

NOTE: Only the unit structure transaction code should be applied. Any EI, EC, ET, MC option codes from the base coverage do not apply to the SCO coverage record.

128848

Enterprise Units: Beginning in the 2022 Reinsurance Year (RY), the RMA has introduced a number of significant changes to Enterprise Unit structure. A brief high-level overview of these changes include: 1) changing Enterprise Units by Irrigation Practice “EP” acronym and unit structure code to “EI”, 2) implementing EC and EI as crop options instead of unit structure codes, and 3) introducing a new enterprise unit variation – Enterprise Units by Type (ET).

Enterprise Units by Type (ET) will be available on Wheat (0011), Dry Beans (0047) and Dry Peas (0067) commodities in counties where the Actuarials allow. Enterprise Units by Type will allow growers to elect Enterprise Units on 1 type or multiple different types before the applicable commodity’s Sales Closing Date (SCD). While Enterprise Units by Irrigation Practice (EI) (Irrigated & Non-Irrigated) and Enterprise Units by Cropping Practice (EC) (FAC & NFAC) are more narrowly focused with 3 different choices a piece (either Practice or Both elected) – Enterprise Units by Type counties will have several potential elections, especially for Dry Beans and Dry Peas. ET will be available for the State/County/Commodity/Plan Code/Type Code when permitted in the Actuarials.

This ticket updated the Manage Unit Structure popup (Additional Functions > Manage Unit Structure) that was implemented with TFS #98357 to provide a more user-friendly experience in understanding the System-determined unit structure and for applying manual unit structure overrides to detail lines. Only displaying on 2019 RY+ policies, the Manage Unit Structure popup is designed to be accessed by eligible AIP and Agency staff. The popup can process a number of critical unit structure processing scenarios concerning all unit structure variations – including Basic Units (BU), Optional Units (OU), and Enterprise Units ((EI), (EC), (MC)).

One of the main purposes of the Manage Unit Structure popup is to apply manual overrides or to mark the Unit Structure Verified checkbox when the underwriter has made a unit structure determination. The popup has a System Determined Unit Structure column that will display the unit structure determined by the System during validation when it runs through all of the RMA regulatory criteria. The popup can also designate Primary/Secondary counties for MCEU and apply the contiguous county coverage for the grower (although ET and MCEU are not compatible at this time).

Since the Manage Unit Structure popup is such a critical piece for unit structure determination within the System, it needed to be updated to comply with the new 2022 RY+ Enterprise Units by Type (ET). There were a number of changes implemented to the Manage Unit Structure popup in order to accommodate ET.

127702

Perennials: MCT was made aware of a bug impacting all Perennial crops and all regions. The bug impacted the System's ability to pull the current RY's t-yield for use in calculating a YA yield and an accurate Approved APH yield. For renewal policies, year 10 (e.g., 2021 Crop Year) was not being considered for YA calculations. For new policies or new APH databases, no t-yields were being pulled for YA calculations. This bug has been resolved. For APHs that have already been processed by agents, the AIP may see specific errors being returned from RMA. APHs will require a manual recalculation after the release goes to production so the current code can be applied.

131056

APH: An issue was reported where the System would not save the AY yield type (YA option elected to be removed on a year within the APH) when acres + a 0 actual yield was keyed. The APH logic has been updated to allow YA to be removed from a yield year using the "AY" yield type.

130184

Enterprise Units: During internal testing a bug was identified on the Manage Unit Structure popup. This bug occurred in the following scenarios:

An override was already set, the user opened the Manage Unit Structure popup, removed the override, and applied the Unit Structure Verified flag. On save, the System would save the change that removed the override but would not save the newly selected Unit Structure Verified flag. A second save was required before this change would save.
The Unit Structure Verified flag was already set, the user opened the Manage Unit Structure popup, removed the Unit Structure Verified flag, and applied an override. On save, the System would save the change that removed the Unit Structure Verified flag but would not save the newly selected override. A second save was required before this change would save.

With this ticket, the save functionality for the Manage Unit Structure popup was updated so that the changes described above are all saved on the initial save.

127960